Prescription of wrong medication

Please click on the titles to read the following case reports:  

H v Gloucestershire Primary Care Trust
H-v-Gloucestershire Royal Hospital NHS Trust (2004)
R (a child) -v- Bath & West Wiltshire Mental Healthcare NHS Trust
X –v- GP and Mental Health Trust

H v Gloucestershire Primary Care Trust

Out of Court settlement: 17.06.2009
 
The Claimant, a 33 year old woman, received £9,000 following the administration of the incorrect drug during the birth of her second child. During labour the treating midwife injected the Claimant with Syntometrine (a drug used to take away the afterbirth following delivery) rather than Pethidine (used for pain relief).
 
Claimant: female, aged 33 at the date of injury; 36 years old at the date of settlement.

Click here to view the full case report.

Back to top

H-v-Gloucestershire Royal Hospital NHS Trust (2004)

Out of Court Settlement 18/8/2004

The claimant, a 74-year-old man, received £207,500 for acute renal failure, loss of hearing and balance following the negligent administration of gentamicin between April and May 1999. The claimant's hearing in both ears was permanently impaired and he became dependant on others for his daily care needs.

Click here to view the full case report

R (a child) -v- Bath & West Wiltshire Mental Healthcare NHS Trust

The Claimant was born on the 18th October 1984, and appeared "different" from birth, failing to use eye contact, never naturally developing a smile, and seeming to have no need for two-way interaction. Between the ages of 2.5 and 3.5 years, paediatric assessment was carried out upon the Claimant. At this stage, he was described as constantly hyperactive, with unpredictable behaviour and tantrums, obsessions which caused him to scream, and developmental language problems. He was treated with "behaviour management" and speech therapy.

Click here for more details

X –v- GP and Mental Health Trust

X sought assistance from her General Practitioner following bereavement. In 1989, Mental Health Services were unable to offer support, because of lack of resources, and so a regime was agreed whereby the patient would be offered informal counselling by the General Practitioner, supposedly under the supervision of a Psychotherapist from the Mental Healthcare Trust.

Because the General Practitioner had had no formal training, nor experience of counselling, he carried out no adequate initial assessment, and embarked upon a wide-ranging and damaging treatment regime, under the fond impression that he was providing a useful service until formal psychotherapy could be put in place by the Mental Healthcare Trust.

Click here for more details